Tensions are rising within Pakistan Tehreek‑e‑Insaf (PTI) over the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) provincial assembly’s decision to pass its 2025–26 budget without consultation with jailed party founder Imran Khan. His sister, Aleema Khan, has strongly denounced the move, stating it shows Imran is being sidelined—or even “minused”—from decision-making within the party’s key stronghold.
A Rift Laid Bare
Aleema spoke to reporters outside Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail, where Imran is currently held. She said, “I think minus Imran Khan has happened,” expressing deep concern over the lack of transparency in the budget’s passage. She pointed out that the KP government didn’t wait the two days that Imran would normally have to review legislation, and questioned what was “hidden from the PTI founder”.
Budget Moves and Backlash
In Peshawar, KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur confirmed the budget was approved even without Imran’s formal input. He accused critics—like Aleema—of prioritizing internal rifts over governance. “Minus Imran Khan will happen when we’re not alive,” he said defiantly, indicating funds will still flow for public services and development.
Gandapur also said the budget aligns with the party’s manifesto and Imran’s past directives. He warned those not willing to stand by the party should step aside . A local PTI leader, Barrister Ali Saif, echoed this, saying Imran was briefed via video link. Aleema, however, remained skeptical and suggested the Supreme Court step in.
Political Stakes
The rift comes at a critical moment. KP remains a PTI bastion, and budgetary powers fuel grassroots support. Approving the budget now could strengthen Gandapur’s grip—but at risk of alienating Imran’s loyal base.
Aleema’s outburst also reflects growing unease among party loyalists. They fear that allowing provincial leadership to act without Imran’s approval could fracture party cohesion even more.
Next Moves and Legal Challenges
Aleema has vowed to take legal steps, stating Imran demanded a Supreme Court review before the budget was passed. PTI’s top leadership, including Imran and his legal team, is expected to challenge the legality of what they see as a rushed, unconsulted process .
Observers suggest that KP politicians are sending a message: Imran may be absent, but governance must continue. Yet failing to involve the party chief could backfire—potentially sparking mass resignations or a federal intervention by the PTI loyalists .
Public and Media Reaction
Local media reports describe Aleema’s comments as a “stinging rebuke,” reflecting PTI’s internal tension. Public sentiment appears split—those seeking normal governance applaud Gandapur’s decisiveness, while Imran’s followers see it as undermining the party’s core values.
Conclusion
The KP budget saga reveals a party at crossroads. On one side, provincial leaders argue that the show must go on, crisis or not. On the other, Imran’s supporters see every bypass as a betrayal. Aleema Khan’s “minus-Imran” claim captures this divide: is PTI evolving beyond its founder—or fracturing without him?
As legal challenges loom and grassroots reactions take shape, the PTI—and Pakistan’s political future—are holding their breath. Only time will tell if Imran’s absence in Peshawar becomes a precedent, or merely a temporary scare in the party’s journey.
